Evaluating inpatient adverse outcomes under California's Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program.

OBJECTIVE: The California Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP) provided incentive payments to Designated Public Hospitals (DPHs) to improve quality of care. We assessed the program's impact on reductions in sepsis mortality, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), and hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs). DATA SOURCES: We used 2009-2014 discharge data from California hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We used a pre-post study design with a comparison group. We constructed propensity scores and used them to assign inverse probability weights according to their similarity to DPH discharges. Interaction term coefficients of time trends and treatment group provided significance testing. DATA EXTRACTION: We used Patient Safety Indicators for CLABSI, HAPU, and VTE, and constructed a sepsis mortality measure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Discharges from DPHs and non-DPHs both saw decreases in the four outcomes over the DSRIP period (2010-2014). The difference-in-difference estimator (DD) for sepsis was only significant during two time periods, comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -2.90 percent, 95% CI: -5.08, -0.72 percent) and 2010 with 2014 (DD: -5.74, 95% CI: -8.76 percent, -2.72 percent); the DD estimator was not significant comparing 2010 with 2012 (DD: -1.30, 95% CI: -3.18 percent, 0.58 percent) or comparing 2010 with 2013 (DD: -3.05 percent, 95% CI: -6.50 percent, 0.40 percent). For CLABSI, we did not find any meaningful differences between DPHs and non-DPHs across the four time periods. For HAPU and VTE, the only significant DD estimator compared 2014 with 2010. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that DPHs participating in DSRIP outperformed non-DPHs during the DSRIP program. Our results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. Given multiple concurrent inpatient safety initiatives, it was challenging to assign improvements over time periods to DSRIP.

Engaging Consumers in Medicaid Program Design: Strategies from the States.

Policy Points As Medicaid programs grow in scale and complexity, greater consumer input may guide successful program design, but little is known about the extent to which state agencies are engaging consumers in the design and implementation of programs and policies. Through 50 semistructured interviews with Medicaid leaders in 14 states, we found significant variation in consumer engagement approaches, with many common facilitators, including leadership commitment, flexible strategies for recruiting and supporting consumer participation, and robust community partnerships. We provide early evidence on how state Medicaid agencies are integrating consumers' experiences and perspectives into their program design and governance. CONTEXT: Consumer engagement early in the process of health care policymaking may improve the effectiveness of program planning and implementation, promote patient-centric care, enhance beneficiary protections, and offer opportunities to improve service delivery. As Medicaid programs grow in scale and complexity, greater consumer input may guide successful program design, but little is known about the extent to which state agencies are currently engaging consumers in the design and implementation of programs and policies, and how this is being done. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with 50 Medicaid program leaders across 14 states, employing a stratified purposive sampling method to select state Medicaid programs based on US census region, rurality, Medicaid enrollment size, total population, ACA expansion status, and Medicaid managed care penetration. Interview data were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and underwent iterative coding with content and thematic analyses. FINDINGS: First, we found variation in consumer engagement approaches, ranging from limited and largely symbolic interactions to longer-term deliberative bodies, with some states tailoring their federally mandated standing committees to engage consumers. Second, most states were motivated by pragmatic considerations, such as identifying and overcoming implementation challenges for agency programs. Third, states reported several common facilitators of successful consumer engagement efforts, including leadership commitment, flexible strategies for recruiting and supporting consumers' participation, and robust community partnerships. All states faced barriers to authentic and sustained engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Sharing best practices across states could help strengthen programs' engagement efforts, identify opportunities for program improvement reflecting community needs, and increase participation among a population that has traditionally lacked a political voice.

Judicialização: reflexões com base na agenda da gestão estadual do SUS / Judicialization: reflections based on the SUS state management agenda

Esta publicação apresenta resultados da pesquisa Judicialização da Saúde no Brasil: aspectos conceitos e reflexões sobre os seus determinantes com base na agenda dos Gestores Estaduais, aprovada pelo CEP/CCM/ UFPB (CAAE: 89030418.2.0000.8069). A referida pesquisa teve o propósito de identificar os elementos centrais na organização da agenda dos gestores estaduais do fenômeno da judicialização, tendo como base uma revisão de literatura sobre a temática; a categorização de conteúdos identificados nos planos de saúde das SES; e a descrição das abordagens e estratégias de comunicação do tema segundo os conteúdos das páginas (web) das Secretarias Estaduais de Saúde e do Distrito Federal (SES). Seu desenvolvimento está vinculado ao Programa de Iniciação Científica da Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), contando com a participação de estudantes de graduação dos cursos de medicina, fisioterapia e de pós-graduação do Mestrado em Saúde Coletiva do CCS-UFPB, além dos pesquisadores coordenadores vinculados ao Departamento de Promoção da Saúde-CCM-UFPB. O projeto entra no seu terceiro ano de desenvolvimento e conta com o apoio do Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Saúde (Conass) para a obtenção de dados.

Pediatric Otolaryngology Divisional and Institutional Preparatory Response at Seattle Children's Hospital after COVID-19 Regional Exposure.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel coronavirus resulting in high mortality in the adult population but low mortality in the pediatric population. The role children and adolescents play in COVID-19 transmission is unclear, and it is possible that healthy pediatric patients serve as a reservoir for the virus. This article serves as a summary of a single pediatric institution's response to COVID-19 with the goal of protecting both patients and health care providers while providing ongoing care to critically ill patients who require urgent interventions. A significant limitation of this commentary is that it reflects a single institution's joint effort at a moment in time but does not take into consideration future circumstances that could change practice patterns. We still hope dissemination of our overall response at this moment, approximately 8 weeks after our region's first adult case, may benefit other pediatric institutions preparing for COVID-19.

Reading the Fine Print: State Considerations for Medicaid Buy-In Plans.

States that are pursuing Medicaid buy-in plans have considerable options in designing a plan to meet their goals. Buy-in plans will reflect key decisions on four major issues: 1) whether plans are sold on or off exchange, 2) whether plans are run by the state or a Medicaid Managed Care Organization, 3) who is eligible to purchase plans, and 4) which benefits and providers will be covered and at what payment rates. Our goal is to clarify the implications of these choices with respect to the goals and with respect to the tradeoffs each choice would involve.

Effects of Integrating Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dually Eligible Seniors in Minnesota.

Individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid often receive fragmented and inefficient care. Using Minnesota fee-for-service claims, managed care encounters, and enrollment data for 2010-2012, we estimated the likely impact of Minnesota Senior Health Option (MSHO)-seen as the first statewide fully integrated Medicare-Medicaid model-on health care and long-term services and supports use, relative to Minnesota Senior Care Plus (MSC+), a Medicaid-only managed care plan with Medicare fee for service. Estimates suggest that MSHO enrollees had significantly higher use of primary care and, potentially, of community-based services, combined with lower use of hospital-based care than similar MSC+ enrollees. Adopting fully integrated care models like MSHO may have merit in other states.

Crise no Brasil e impactos na frágil governança regional e federativa da política de saúde / Crisis in Brazil and impacts on the fragile regional and federative health policy governance

Resumo Desde 2014, o Brasil vive crise econômica-fiscal-política-institucional. Este estudo avalia se a implementação das respostas à crise contribuiu para fragilizar a governança regional e federativa do SUS. Trata-se de estudo de implementação, ampliando-o com duas categorias da saúde coletiva, o poder em Testa e o sujeito em Campos, compreendendo que a implementação desloca poder e constrói sujeitos. Analisamos dados públicos, de 2014 a 2018, organizados em quatro eixos de análise: a) instrumentos de implementação da resposta à crise; b) interferência do Legislativo e do Judiciário nos investimentos; c) marcos legais da regionalização; d) atores federativos e possíveis coalizões de defesa. Os resultados revelam redução de recursos federais, especificamente para redes regionais de atenção; aumento da interferência legislativa e judicial nos recursos da saúde, pela evolução das emendas parlamentares e das ações judiciais e mudanças nas diretrizes de regionalização do SUS. Observa-se deslocamento de poder dos arranjos regionais federativos para o governo central, parlamento, judiciário e serviços locais isolados. Conclui-se que a resposta à crise fragilizou a governança regional federativa do SUS, agravando os impactos da crise na saúde.

Abstract Since 2014, Brazil has been experiencing an economic-fiscal-political-institutional crisis. This study evaluates whether the implementation of crisis responses contributed to weaken SUS regional and federative governance. This is an implementation study, and two theoretical categories of public health, the power in Testa and the subject in Campos have been incorporated. It presumes that the implementation shifts power and develops subjects. We analyzed public data from 2014 to 2018, organized into four axes of analysis: a) instruments for implementing crisis response; b) parliament and judicial interference in investments; c) legal frameworks of regionalization; d) federative actors and possible defense coalitions. Results show reduced federal resources, specifically for regional care networks; increased parliament and judicial interference with health resources, due to the evolution of congressional amendments and lawsuits, and changes in SUS regionalization guidelines. There is a shift of power from federative regional arrangements to the central government, parliament, the judiciary, and isolated local services. It is concluded that the response to the crisis weakened the regional federative governance of SUS, aggravating the impacts of the crisis on health.

A crise econômica e a atenção primária à saúde no SUS da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil / The economic crisis and primary health care in the SUS of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Resumo Este artigo aborda a crise na atenção primária à saúde do sistema público de saúde da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, a partir de 2018. Tal município teve forte expansão da atenção primária desde 2009, adotando Organizações Sociais para a contratação de profissionais e gerenciamento dos serviços, qualificando a infraestrutura das unidades e priorizando a medicina de família e comunidade, além de adotar práticas gerenciais como normatizações de ofertas, avaliação e remuneração por desempenho, "marketing", dentre outras. Diante da recente crise econômica, a decisão do gestor municipal foi de reduzir equipes de saúde da família, considerando a atual Política Nacional de Atenção Básica e argumentando ser possível otimizar recursos (fazendo mais com menos). Neste processo, enfrentou resistências, que não foram suficientes para freá-lo. Pela ressonância desta cidade (segunda maior do Brasil e com destaque na imprensa nacional) e tomando como base documentos públicos e formulações sobre a gestão, a crise expressa na atenção básica deste município foi problematizada em torno das implicações da adoção de Organizações Sociais na sustentabilidade dos serviços, da condução dos processos de gestão e suas racionalidades bem como da atuação política de agentes sociais em defesa do SUS e da atenção primária em particular.

Abstract This paper addresses the primary health care crisis of Rio de Janeiro public health system as of 2018. This municipality has experienced a robust primary care expansion since 2009, adopting Social Organizations for recruiting professionals and managing services, qualifying the infrastructure of units and prioritizing family and community medicine, as well as adopting management practices such as standardized offers, evaluation and pay-for-performance compensation, marketing, among others. Given the recent economic crisis, the municipal manager decided to reduce family health teams, considering the current National Policy of Primary Care and arguing that it is possible to optimize resources (doing more with less). In this process, he faced resistance that was not enough to stop him. Due to the resonance of this city (second largest in Brazil and prominent in the national press) and based on public documents and formulations on management, the crisis expressed in the primary health care of this city was debated around the implications of the adoption of Social Organizations in the sustainability of health services, conducting management processes and their rationalities, as well as the political action of social agents advocating for the SUS and primary care in particular.

Redes regionalizadas e garantia de atenção especializada em saúde: a experiência do Ceará, Brasil / Regionalized networks and guarantee of specialized health care: the experience of Ceará, Brazil

Resumo O artigo analisa políticas e instrumentos de gestão voltados à organização regional da atenção especializada no Ceará. Foi desenvolvido estudo de caso em uma região de saúde, com realização de 18 entrevistas com dirigentes e profissionais de saúde municipais e regionais e visita a serviços. Diversos fatores possibilitaram avanços na organização da atenção especializada: protagonismo da Secretaria Estadual da Saúde na coordenação regional de ações e serviços, proporcionando infraestrutura, financiamento com redistribuição de recursos e apoio técnico aos municípios; implantação de Policlínica e Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas regionais via Consórcio Público de Saúde; e apoio logístico de sistema de transporte. A institucionalidade do Conselho de Secretários Municipais de Saúde e o funcionamento participativo da Comissão Intergestores Regional propiciaram espaço favorável à governança regional. Permanecem desafios à integração da rede, qualificação da regulação assistencial e oferta de retaguarda hospitalar na região. Os resultados reforçam a importância do fortalecimento de arranjos públicos e universais para provisão de atenção integral à saúde, capazes de reduzir iniquidades.

Abstract This paper analyzes policies and management tools aimed at the regional organization of specialized care in Ceará. A case study was developed in a health region based on 18 interviews with regional and municipal managers and health professionals and visits to services. Several factors enabled advances in the organization of specialized care: the preponderant role of the State Health Secretariat in the regional health coordination of actions and services, providing infrastructure, financing with redistribution of resources and technical support to municipalities; implantation of regional Polyclinic and Specialized Dental Care Centers through the Public Health Consortium; and logistics support of transport system. The institutional framework of Municipal Health Secretaries Council and the participatory functioning of the Regional Interagency Committee provided adequate space for the regional governance. Challenges remain for the integration of the network, qualification of care regulation, and provision of hospital care in the region. The results reinforce the importance of public and universal arrangements for the provision of comprehensive health care that can reduce inequities.

Regionalized networks and guarantee of specialized health care: the experience of Ceará, Brazil. / Redes regionalizadas e garantia de atenção especializada em saúde: a experiência do Ceará, Brasil.

This paper analyzes policies and management tools aimed at the regional organization of specialized care in Ceará. A case study was developed in a health region based on 18 interviews with regional and municipal managers and health professionals and visits to services. Several factors enabled advances in the organization of specialized care: the preponderant role of the State Health Secretariat in the regional health coordination of actions and services, providing infrastructure, financing with redistribution of resources and technical support to municipalities; implantation of regional Polyclinic and Specialized Dental Care Centers through the Public Health Consortium; and logistics support of transport system. The institutional framework of Municipal Health Secretaries Council and the participatory functioning of the Regional Interagency Committee provided adequate space for the regional governance. Challenges remain for the integration of the network, qualification of care regulation, and provision of hospital care in the region. The results reinforce the importance of public and universal arrangements for the provision of comprehensive health care that can reduce inequities.

O artigo analisa políticas e instrumentos de gestão voltados à organização regional da atenção especializada no Ceará. Foi desenvolvido estudo de caso em uma região de saúde, com realização de 18 entrevistas com dirigentes e profissionais de saúde municipais e regionais e visita a serviços. Diversos fatores possibilitaram avanços na organização da atenção especializada: protagonismo da Secretaria Estadual da Saúde na coordenação regional de ações e serviços, proporcionando infraestrutura, financiamento com redistribuição de recursos e apoio técnico aos municípios; implantação de Policlínica e Centro de Especialidades Odontológicas regionais via Consórcio Público de Saúde; e apoio logístico de sistema de transporte. A institucionalidade do Conselho de Secretários Municipais de Saúde e o funcionamento participativo da Comissão Intergestores Regional propiciaram espaço favorável à governança regional. Permanecem desafios à integração da rede, qualificação da regulação assistencial e oferta de retaguarda hospitalar na região. Os resultados reforçam a importância do fortalecimento de arranjos públicos e universais para provisão de atenção integral à saúde, capazes de reduzir iniquidades.

The economic crisis and primary health care in the SUS of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. / A crise econômica e a atenção primária à saúde no SUS da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

This paper addresses the primary health care crisis of Rio de Janeiro public health system as of 2018. This municipality has experienced a robust primary care expansion since 2009, adopting Social Organizations for recruiting professionals and managing services, qualifying the infrastructure of units and prioritizing family and community medicine, as well as adopting management practices such as standardized offers, evaluation and pay-for-performance compensation, marketing, among others. Given the recent economic crisis, the municipal manager decided to reduce family health teams, considering the current National Policy of Primary Care and arguing that it is possible to optimize resources (doing more with less). In this process, he faced resistance that was not enough to stop him. Due to the resonance of this city (second largest in Brazil and prominent in the national press) and based on public documents and formulations on management, the crisis expressed in the primary health care of this city was debated around the implications of the adoption of Social Organizations in the sustainability of health services, conducting management processes and their rationalities, as well as the political action of social agents advocating for the SUS and primary care in particular.

Este artigo aborda a crise na atenção primária à saúde do sistema público de saúde da cidade do Rio de Janeiro, a partir de 2018. Tal município teve forte expansão da atenção primária desde 2009, adotando Organizações Sociais para a contratação de profissionais e gerenciamento dos serviços, qualificando a infraestrutura das unidades e priorizando a medicina de família e comunidade, além de adotar práticas gerenciais como normatizações de ofertas, avaliação e remuneração por desempenho, "marketing", dentre outras. Diante da recente crise econômica, a decisão do gestor municipal foi de reduzir equipes de saúde da família, considerando a atual Política Nacional de Atenção Básica e argumentando ser possível otimizar recursos (fazendo mais com menos). Neste processo, enfrentou resistências, que não foram suficientes para freá-lo. Pela ressonância desta cidade (segunda maior do Brasil e com destaque na imprensa nacional) e tomando como base documentos públicos e formulações sobre a gestão, a crise expressa na atenção básica deste município foi problematizada em torno das implicações da adoção de Organizações Sociais na sustentabilidade dos serviços, da condução dos processos de gestão e suas racionalidades bem como da atuação política de agentes sociais em defesa do SUS e da atenção primária em particular.

Qualitative Assessment of Washington State Medicaid Health Plan Readiness to Implement Systems-Based Approaches to Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs by Medicaid health plans could address colorectal cancer screening disparities. Our objective is to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of a population-based colorectal cancer screening program by Washington State Medicaid health plans. We conducted semi-structured interviews with leadership from 2 statewide and 3 national Medicaid plans. We organized the interview questions around the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We analyzed interview transcripts, guided by directed content analysis, and identified facilitators and barriers to Medicaid health plan implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs. Robust health plan (inner setting) quality improvement infrastructures were facilitators. Lack of statewide Medicaid policy incentives (external setting) to increase colorectal cancer screening were barriers to potential implementation. Efforts to address identified barriers through local and national policies and statewide data sharing efforts may support Medicaid health plan implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs.

Assessing and Addressing Social Determinants of Health: A Key Competency for Succeeding in Value-Based Care.

There is growing recognition that social determinants of health influence individual and population health. A well-designed population health management strategy can yield improved outcomes for a given community, while improving the financial health of health care systems and providers. This article provides an overview of aligned care delivery, community engagement, education, technology, and other key strategies required to address the needs of patients and communities. A holistic vision incorporating social factors can lead to a return on investment and improvement in the health of a community, at the same time decreasing health care costs for the population managed.

Cost-effectiveness of option B+ in prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Yunnan Province, China.

BACKGROUND: Although Option B+ may be more costly than Options B, it may provide additional health benefits that are currently unclear in Yunnan province. We created deterministic models to estimate the cost-effectiveness of Option B+. METHODS: Data were used in two deterministic models simulating a cohort of 2000 HIV+ pregnant women. A decision tree model simulated the number of averted infants infections and QALY acquired for infants in the PMTCT period for Options B and B+. The minimum cost was calculated. A Markov decision model simulated the number of maternal life year gained and serodiscordant partner infections averted in the ten years after PMTCT for Option B or B+. ICER per life year gained was calculated. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: If fully implemented, Option B and Option B+ averted 1016.85 infections and acquired 588,01.02 QALYs.The cost of Option B was US$1,229,338.47, the cost of Option B+ was 1,176,128.63. However, when Options B and B+ were compared over ten years, Option B+ not only improved mothers'ten-year survival from 69.7 to 89.2%, saving more than 3890 life-years, but also averted 3068 HIV infections between serodiscordant partners. Option B+ yielded a favourable ICER of $32.99per QALY acquired in infants and $5149per life year gained in mothers. A 1% MTCT rate, a 90% coverage rate and a 20-year horizon could decrease the ICER per QALY acquired in children and LY gained in mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Option B+ is a cost-effective treatment for comprehensive HIV prevention for infants and serodiscordant partners and life-long treatment for mothers in Yunnan province, China. Option B+ could be implemented in Yunnan province, especially as the goals of elimination mother-to-child transmission of HIV and "90-90-90" achieved, Option B+ would be more attractive.

An analysis of psychiatric services provided to adults in 2010-2014 based on the National Health Fund data. / Analiza swiadczen psychiatrycznych udzielonych osobom doroslym w latach 2010-2014 na podstawie danych Narodowego Funduszu Zdrowia.

OBJECTIVES: Analyzing the indices that allow to improve population health by, for example, improving the quality of healthcare services and increasing accessibility to these services is among the priorities of the World Health Organization (WHO). This is of particular importance in Poland, as the psychiatric care reform is being carried out in accordance with the National Mental Healthcare Program guidelines. The aim of the study is to analyze mental health services provided to adults and reported to the National Health Fund in 2010-2014. METHODS: In the present study, we expanded the information included in the second part of the maps of health needs. In addition to the evaluation of services provided to adults in 2014, we presented an analysis of services in 2010-2014. According to these data, there was a continuous increase both in thenumber of individuals provided with services for psychiatric disorders and in the total number of provided services. There was an increase in the number of patients treated for mood disorders, neurotic disorders, stress-related and somatic disorders, as well as addictions. RESULTS: The increase in the total number of services was mainly seen for outpatient types of care. The reasons why in 2014 there was a resurgence in psychiatric hospitalizations and in the hospitalization rate per 100 thousand adults remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the need for further support of the development of psychiatric care using multidirectional efforts within an integrated model for solving health problems. An overall analysis of services provided in psychiatric care requires access to information on services funded from non-public sources and expanding the reported information.

Disability and corporeal (im)mobility: how interstate variation in Medicaid impacts the cross-state plans and pursuits of personal care attendant service users.

Purpose: This paper addresses how Medicaid personal care attendant (PCA) service users with physical disabilities experience barriers to cross-state movement arising from the interstate variation in these programs. Using the Moves in Context model, this analysis focuses on the structural-level influences on individual cross-state move trajectories.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 Medicaid PCA service users who were considering or pursuing cross-state moves motivated by opportunity. Questions addressed the cross-state move process; social participation; education and employment; and access to PCA services. Grounded theory methods were used to analyze interview transcripts and generate analytic codes and categories.Findings: Participants described their experiences with interstate variation in Medicaid PCA services in terms of (1) contending with conflicts between the need for services and the desire for cross-state moves; (2) navigating "hoops of fire"; and (3) recasting imagined futures. Participants also expressed experiences of intrastate confinement, or being stuck in their current state (4) using metaphors of immobility and (5) recognizing intrastate confinement as a form of categorical exclusion.Conclusion: Interstate variation in Medicaid PCA policy impedes program users' ability to pursue educational and occupational advancement, and leads to feelings of second-class citizenship. Policy changes should be explored to affirm the autonomy of Medicaid PCA service users.Implications for Rehabilitation Interstate variation in Medicaid PCA services and cross-state moves • Medicaid personal care assistance service users desire and pursue cross-state moves, especially when drawn by educational or employment opportunities. • Interstate variation in Medicaid policy negatively impacts the ability for PCA service program users to pursue these moves due to gaps or delays in service access, creating inequity in opportunity and feelings of second-class citizenship. • Individual users of Medicaid PCA services need information and services as they plan pursue cross-state moves. • States and the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services should offer guidance to support the independent living, educational, and economic goals of users of PCA services who desire cross-state moves.

Supporting Transformation through Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Programs: Lessons from New York State.

The New York Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) waiver was viewed as a prototype for Medicaid and safety net redesign waivers in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) era. After the insurance expansions of the ACA were implemented, it was apparent that accountability, value, and quality improvement would be priorities in future waivers in many states. Despite New York's distinct provider relationships, previous coverage expansions, and local and state politics, it is important to understand the key characteristics of the waiver so that other states can learn how to better incorporate value-based arrangements into future waivers or attempts to limit spending under proposed Medicaid per-capita caps or block grants. In this article, we examine the New York DSRIP waiver by drawing on its design, early experiences, and evolution to inform recommendations for the future renewal, implementation, and expansion of redesigned or transformational Medicaid waivers.